ALM5 Conference

 

ALM Archives Abstracts ALM5 in English  Abstracts ALM5 - Español Proceedings

ALM5 - Abstracts in English

                                                              Plenary Sessions

#01

Opening keynote address:

Empowerment and Numeracy development: Research challenges

Dr. Iddo Gal  (University of Haifa, Israel)                       

Empowerment is a multi-faceted construct that has emerged in recent years in several disciplines and appears to be a promising framework for thinking about mathematics education in general and about adult numeracy education in particular. The empowerment construct is complex as it has multiple meanings: an ideology, a characterization of desired goal states of diverse learners, change processes in learners, and the educational practices or interventions that can bring about desired changes. Likewise, mathematics education for adults (which in some cases is subsumed under the term "adult numeracy education") involves diverse types of learners with diverse backgrounds and goals who participate in a wide range of different flavors of mathematics education.

This talk will discuss key premises, concepts, and dilemmas associated with empowerment in the context of mathematics education and specifically adult numeracy education, in light of overarching goals of lifelong learning and the need to develop autonomy, participation, and effective functioning of citizens. Among the issues discussed will be the nature of numerate behavior and its reliance on knowledge bases from mathematics but also literacy, the need to attend not only to the cognitive but also to the dispositional and affective aspects of numerate, empowered individuals, as well as the need to broaden the current thinking about the goals of mathematics education for adults if an empowerment perspective is adopted. Implications of the empowerment perspective will be presented for research and evaluation efforts, regarding both the need to focus on empowerment processes and outcomes among learners (but also among teachers) as well as the need to employ research approaches or designs that can foster empowerment of all stakeholders. Implications for instructional practices, teacher training, and assessment will also be briefly raised.

#02

Second keynote address:

Everyday mathematics and Adult Mathematics Education

Prof. Analucia Schliemann  (Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA)              

Research on everyday cognition shows that, out of schools, through participation in everyday activities, people come to develop mathematical understanding and procedures to solve mathematical problems.  Strategies for solving arithmetical operations, use of the properties of the decimal system, understanding and solution of proportionality problems, measurement, geometry, and probability concepts are examples of mathematical knowledge developed in everyday settings by children or adults with restricted schooling. 

Acknowledging development and use of logico-mathematical reasoning by people with limited school experience is a crucial step towards promoting opportunities for progress and learning in schools. It is by bringing previous knowledge into the process of understanding new situations and representational systems that students come to develop more advanced mathematical knowledge. But how can people use previous knowledge and experiences constitute the basis for learning school mathematics? Should we replicate everyday situations in the classroom?  Can we find everyday tasks that would fit all or most of the contents in the mathematics curriculum? And, if so, once an everyday task is replicated in the classroom, are we dealing with the same task?  Can we expect that adult students will be as involved in understanding school mathematical situations as they are when they search for solutions to problems in everyday life?

Answering these questions demands careful analysis of the characteristics of everyday mathematics, as opposed to school mathematics. In this presentation the relevance of everyday mathematics for adult mathematics education will be considered through the review of previous studies on everyday mathematics, focusing on five main aspects: (a) the question of meaning, (b) the question of generalization and transfer, (c) the question of concrete referents for mathematical symbols, (d) the socio-interactive contexts of mathematical activity, and (e) the relevance of school instruction. 

The available research data shows that, although everyday mathematical understanding can constitute a solid, meaningful basis for the development of more advanced mathematical activities in school and to the meaningful learning of new conventional symbolic systems, it has its own limits. Schools can provide a much wider range of situations and tools for use and representation of mathematical concepts and relations, allowing for learners to explicitly focus on these from different perspectives, establishing links between situations that would otherwise remain unrelated. 

Recognizing the importance of school does not diminish the importance of the prior knowledge students bring into mathematics instruction from their everyday experiences. In fact, recent studies show that everyday mathematics constitutes an even broader and deeper source of knowledge and intuition than was previously thought. Moreover, for meaningful learning to take place in the classroom, reflection upon mathematical relations must be embedded, as it happens in everyday life, in meaningful socially relevant situations where mathematics becomes a tool to achieve relevant goals. Such school situations, however, must allow for a wider variety of concepts and representations and for the discovery of features that are not usually involved in street situations. They should also be as meaningful, challenging, flexible, and relevant for adult students as getting the correct change is for the street seller and his customers.

#03

Numeracy results of the International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS) and follow up research into adult numeracy: International Life Skills Survey (ILSS)

Stan Jones (Statistics Canada, Yarmouth, Novia Scotia, Canada)

Willem Houtkoop (Max Goote Kenniscentrum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Between 1994 and 1996 a number of countries collected data on the literacy skills of their adult population as part of the International Adult Literacy Survey (and others are still in the field collecting data). Part of the survey included a measure of quantitative literacy, the ability to use numbers found in texts. While the quantitative literacy measure does not include everything one might include in numeracy, it does provide some insight into the mathematics skills of adults.  In this presentation we will discuss the nature the quantitative literacy measure, identify some of the important consequences of differences in quantitative skill in the different countries. One of the important findings of the survey is that occupations that are growing are particularly demanding of quantitative skill.

We will also suggest ways in which the measure might be expanded to cover a broader range of numeracy skills. 

As a follow-up to the International Adult Literacy Survey (Statistics Canada and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1994-1998), a number of countries have expressed an interest in a more extensive study of adult skills, the International Life Skills Survey (ILSS). One purpose of such a project would be to support the strategic directions on lifelong learning set out by the OECD Education Committee at the Ministerial level in January 1996.

One of the areas to be covered in the study is adult numeracy, understood as the use of mathematics at work and in everyday life.  This presentation will present the developing framework for the numeracy assessment so that participants in the conference can contribute to the design of the study. It is intended that the comments of the participants will be reported to the advisory committee and used in revising the framework. It is hoped that the framework will reflect the current understanding of adult numeracy and that the project will serve to validate and publicise this understanding.

#04

Key principles for designing effective South African inset mathematical curricula.

Prof. Hugh Glover, University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa

Many South African teachers are products of a former education system, where they were severely disadvantaged.  Most of them were exposed to pre-service courses which lacked emphasis on developing teachers own conceptual understandings and competencies in mathematics and mathematics teaching. Whilst some attempts are currently being made to address these shortfalls, current South African mathematics education reforms will fail unless serious attention is given to addressing these needs.

This paper will briefly describe a mix of mathematics In-service programmes designed and implemented by a South African project based at the University of Port Elizabeth’s Centre for Continuing Education (UPE, CENCE). This project is located in the Eastern Cape, one of South Africa’s nine provinces.

It will then, as a major focus of the presentation, highlight key principles that have emerged as important in the development of In-service curricula, offered by UPE, CENCE. These principles could be important in improving existing and future curricula. These principles include:

-    the active participation by learners in all learning experiences, in order to promote reflective practices.

-    the development of rich, deep mathematical concepts, through the design and implementation of appropriate mathematical tasks

-    the development of relatively inexpensive, durable and appealing classroom materials

-    the design and implementation of classroom teaching-learning situations which promote positive, confident pupils with good mathematical understanding

The manner in which each of these principles has guided curriculum development will be outlined through the provision of specific examples related to the initial programme overview.  

                                                                   Workshops

#05

Understanding graphs in adult mathematical education

Esther Leonelli  (Community Learning Center, Cambridge, MA), Tom Macdonald (Family College, Cambridge, MA), Ricardo Nemirovsky (TERC, Cambridge, MA), Analucia Schliemann (Tufts University, Medford, MA), Mary Jane Schmitt (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA), Janet Sebell (Bridgewater State College, MA)

Research shows that students learn to use and talk about graphs without previous teaching about the formal rules involved in graphing.  Rather, they became graph‑users by recognizing how the shape of a graph can tell stories, by expressing their own kinesthetic experiences with graphs, and by identifying meaning for the visual attributes of a graph (Nemirovsky,1994).  Thus, learning graphing requires a rich environment that encourages conversations and explorations around intuitions rooted in the everyday experience of life with symbols and events. 

This workshop will demonstrate the activities and results of a pilot classroom study designed to explore these ideas in an adult education program. The activities aimed at the creation of interactive environments which included technological tools and where the teacher and the students engage in the activity with a playful attitude and with the sense of being co‑researchers, trying their ideas to achieve certain goals. Students are not asked to show what they know but, instead, they try to describe and represent events. There are no previously established correct answers; the sense that they have achieved a good representation emerges from their discussion and reflections.  Use of everyday experience comes in different formats. It enriches the activities, gives a purpose to them, and provides ways to first attempt to represent events. Previous experiences with numbers, space, directions, turns, all come into play, allowing the establishment of analogies which enrich students understanding of representations.  Like in everyday life, they develop mathematical ideas in order to achieve meaningful goals. Social interactions provide the opportunity for the development of new  forms of reasoning and representations, as each individual try new approaches and reasons about the results and the questions and constraints raised by the others. There is a progression and enrichment of the representation that results from conflicting views between the participants and a search for coherence between and within events and representations. 

The workshop will provide hands-on experience with the activities and opportunities to analyze selected videotaped classroom interactions. Further, we will discuss how our results led us to develop emergent perspectives on the nature of graphing, the use of educational technology to incorporate kinesthetic experiences in mathematical understanding, and the relationship between everyday cognition and adult mathematics education. Through the combination of these perspectives we hope to contribute to the creation of richer environments to support mathematical understanding as part of lifelong learning.

#06

'ALM' as a community of practice and research

Roseanne Benn (University of Exeter, Great Britain), Juergen Maasz (University of Linz, Austria), Tine Wedege (Roskilde University, Denmark)

'Adults learning mathematics' is a new field of research between adult education and mathematics education. Some of the research questions are sociological, some psychological; other questions are educational or didactic.

At the conference ALM-4 at Limerick in 1997, Tine Wedege started a meta-discussion about the nature of this new field of research. She formulated the question: Could there be a specific problematique for research in adults' mathematics education? (Meaning a systematically linked problem field in which questions and answers about the subject field are formulated on the basis of a certain theoretical and/or methodological approach.) The debate showed that this is a very complex issue. 

In this workshop, we will discuss whether our community of practice and research in ALM is situated within the didactics of mathematics (meaning the scientific discipline related to research and development work in mathematics education) or not?

Do practice and research in ALM exceed the limits of the didactics of mathematics?

#07

Count on me 

Wim Matthijsse  (National Center for Research and Development for Adult Education, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands)

The project ‘Count on me’ aims the development of a series of 10 CD-roms on mathematics for students in adult education and vocational training who want to brush up their mathematical knowledge and skills or to fill gaps in this area.

Students should be able to work independently with these materials. They will be guided by an adaptive built-in tutor system.

The first prototype, that will be presented at the conference, is on percents. This module contents a database with in it, amongst other, video-clips with real life situations, selected video-clips with specific instruction on percents, assignments with feedback, three interactive mental models. The student may want to be guided from an adaptive built-in tutor. This tutor’s guidance is based on ‘student-history’ information in the program. However the student will also be able to set aside the tutor’s advice and to take decisions how to go further in the program apart from the tutor’s advice. This is called ‘mixed control’.

Discussion:

A question in the field of adaptive CD-roms is in what way and until what point educational cumputer programs could and should take over the guidance and instruction of the teacher.

What functions would be wished to be automatized and based on what didactical point of view?

What instruction and guidance functions can be automatized?

In what way will it be possible to create an interaction between student and computer program as ‘natural’ as possible?  How should the learning process be guided?

A main point of discussion is the tense between an open learning environment in which the student decides as opposed to a tutor-guided learning situation in which the program decides about the next step in the program.

#08

The virtual mathematics workplace

Harrie Sormani (National Center for Research and Development for Adult Education, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands)  

The purpose of this workshop is to introduce the audience in the use of Internet in a math classroom for Dutch adult students working on so called ‘KSE levels 1-4'. That means: for people with very little mathematics background. The Dutch National Institute for Research and Development in adult education and vocational training (Cinop), together with teaching teams of the Regional Education Center Eindhoven and the Regional Education Center Rijn and IJssel College, developed a website in past months to which mathematics problems can be posted every month. These math problems are not only meant to yield an answer but also to start discussions among students. A student may post hist results to the electronic bulletin board and by this he will be able to compare these with the answers of other students from other institutes. They can discuss together their solving procedures and solutions. The math problems have been constructed in such a way that they provoke practical application of integrative mathematical knowledge and skills. Developers and teachers have their own private meeting page where they can work jointly, apart from the student page. How it works will be demonstrated during the workshop.

#09

Teaching and Learning Mathematics through art: A multicultural approach

Eliana Maria Guedes, Regina Maria Zandonadi, Diomar Cesar Lobão (University of Taubaté - Unitau  - Brazil)

The environment where counseling and support activities in Mathematics take place, directly helping students and teachers with the Project AArt and Mathematics will be presented, focusing particularly on how the relationship of shapes and geometry has been incorporated into art, providing an engaging introduction to this realm of mathematics. This project,  part of the Educational Programme Rediscovering Mathematics, has been developed with adult students which attend elementary evening courses.

The principal aims of the activities are to break the barrier of myths which usually comes with the teaching and learning of Mathematics and  to develop creativeness through the integration of Art and Mathematics looking for:

- the development of the visual ability. 

- the learning and teaching of Mathematics.

- the integration between Mathematics and Art.

- the social integration.

We have been doing this work in different regions of Brazil and South America, bringing together students, teachers and tutors interested in the teaching and learning of Mathematics through Art, considering that:

-    interest is one of the first rules of learning, having the world as a mediator to a process by which man learns about himself and others.

-    the teaching of Mathematics, specially Geometry through Art contributes to the formative process, improving creativeness and favouring a particular type of thought, seeking new situations and being sensitive to the visual impact. Together, Art and Mathematics, form a perfect union of creativeness and knowledge, the one the instrument for the other, functioning at their highest and best.

The teaching and learning of Mathematics, specially Geometry through Art contributes to the formative process, improving creativeness and favouring a particular type of thought, seeking new situations and being sensitive to the visual impact.

#10

Adult Maths and everyday life: building bridges, Facilitating 'Transfer'

Dr. Jeff Evans, Middlesex University, UK

What kind of maths should we teach in order to enable adults to function satisfactorily in their work and everyday lives? A typical adult has a life/lives based on activities that are relatively fully developed and in which s/he is relatively fully involved (compared with a typical child).

But in the usual A.B.E. or college pre‑calculus course, there will be much variation in the relevant activities that different students are involved in. And further for each student there will be much variation in their activities over their lifetime. Thus, in order to empower our students the mathematics taught must be flexible, powerful, and critical.

In offering some ideas as to how to proceed I shall describe an approach that builds on but moves beyond, both traditional learning transfer theories and situated cognition. For the curriculum, it aims to locate and to describe a shared discourse such as "ctritical citizenship" (Evans & Thorstad, 1995/ALM‑1); in pedagogy, it aims to emphasise "transfer of strategies" over "transfer of algorithms" (Schliemann, 1995/PME.19) and to draw on ideas for "teaching for transfer" from cognitive psychologists.

#11    

Getting at QAdult Basic Education Students' Sturdy Strategies: a Pilot study.

Mary Jane Schmitt (Milton, USA)

What sturdy, workable strategies and algorithms do adults enrolled in adult basic education programs in the U.S. use in their everyday lives to deal with quantities?  Recently, I conducted a small‑scale qualitative research project to begin lend insight to this question. My hypothesis is that adult numeracy students use strategies that are quite different from those taught in adult basic education programs, and these strategies often remain hidden from teachers. How can we identify these strategies? What can we learn from identifying and documenting these numeracy practices? Are the strategies idiosyncratic, or can we detect themes? How might this inform the adult mathematics curriculum? My research draws upon the works of Carraher, Schliemann, Harris, Lave and Scribner, but also considers Dehaene's theory of the existence of an innate and persistent "number sense."

#12

Building the concepts of multiplication and division

Ruth Polkinghorne (Bath, UK)    

Tutors of basic numeracy students tend to teach the four rules one after the other as if they follow a logical order directly building on the preiously learned skill. To some extend this is the case but not totally so. Just because a student can add and take away does not mean that they have all the skills or understand all the concepts that are needed to go on to multiply and divide.

To add follows on from counting. The need to do this on a simple level is all around. To subtract is also something with which they are familiar. Using money gives lots of examples of the need in very practical terms to add and take away. The step on from this to multiply and divide is not as smotth as it may seem to those of us who have mastered these ideas and use them regularly almost without thinking. Many basic numeracy students use repeated addition or similar add/subtsct methods instead of multiply and divide in practical situations. This leads on to a number of questions for the tutor of basic numeracy students.

1.  Do they avoid multiply and divide because they cannot handle the concepts?

2.  If they knew their tables fluently would they be more likely to use them?

3.  Do they not know their tables because there is no incentive to learn?

4.  If the concept is difficult can it be broken down into more basic concepts to enable them to build up to them?

These are questions I have been asking myself and which form the basis of ongoing work.

This presentation relates to the theme of lifelong learning as it is about the way students can develop the skills to enable them to carry out the sort of calculations most of us take for granted.

#13

Who is an adult? How does our definition affect our practice? 

Kathy Safford (St. Peter’s College, New Jersey, USA)

The traditional definition of an adult student does not accurately describe the diverse adult student populations whom we meet in our classrooms. This session will introduce major psychological and educational theories relevant to adult mathematics education. The presenter will then give examples of evidence of their presence or absence from her experiences. Participants will be asked to share insights based on their own work with adult math students.

The developmental psychology theory incorporated into this session is particularly applicable to the theme of lifelong learning. Little is learned by the student in isolation. All new information or skills require assimilation into the previous knowledge base of the individual, knowledge acquired during a lifetime spent in and out of formal schooling. The adult education practitioner experiences are validated and enhanced by knowledge of the theoretical framework within which s/he practices.

#14       

The role of feelings and logic and their interaction in the solution of everyday problems 

Dhamma Colwell (King’s College, University of London, UK)

In my ongoing research project investigating what maths adults use in their everyday lives, I have been recording discussions in a focus group of women and observing upholsterers and gardeners at work. The results concord with Lave and Wenger's theory of situated cognition (1991) and with an expanded version of Saxe's model of culture and cognition (1991).

I am finding that the participants use logical processes to solve everyday emergent problems and that their feelings about themselves and other people, and about maths, strongly influence what they choose to do and how they choose to do it. After reporting on my work, I would be grateful for colleagues' response to my analysis.

#15

TWIN -project: Useful mathematics for technical vocational education

Henk van der Kooij  (Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht,  Netherlands)

In most vocational courses in The Netherlands, mathematics education is a formal, merely algebraic course in which students learn algorithmic behaviour that doesn't make any sense outside the mathematics classroom. Skipping mathematics as a separate course from the educational program was the most logical option for vocational education. Only a shift towards a more practical program could save math from fading away.

In 1997 a curriculum project was started with the aim to design a program in which mathematics is really supportive for vocational practice and in which new tools from information technology are integrated. Starting point for the design of the student materials is the theory of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) as it is developed by the Freudenthal Institute (Freudenthal, 1973, 1991; Treffers, 1987; de Lange, 1987; Gravemeijer, 1994).

In the RME approach of mathematics, rich context problems are starting point for mathematical activities. The concreteness of the contextual problems offers students the opportunity to develop own strategies to attack and solve problems. When contexts and problems are chosen carefully, it is possible for students to experience a kind of guided re-invention of mathematical methods. These personal strategies of students lead to a formalization of strategies, in which de-contextualization of the strategies makes strategies applicable to new problems in other contexts (transfer-principle). Furthermore: technology leads to non‑traditional methods that often can replace usual strategies.

In this workshop the ideas behind this approach will be discussed. Of course there will be hands on activities, just to experience the theory yourself.

Statement: Mathematics education that ignores the transfer-principle is useless for real life.

#16

Mathematics, class and lifelong learning

Roseanne Benn (University of Exeter, UK)

The call for papers for this conference asks what kind of maths should we teach in order to enable adults to manage their own life and to function optimally in work and social life. In the session I will suggest that what we teach is linked to who we teach. Therefore we must always consider the social and cultural background of our students. I will argue that Britain is still a class-ridden society, illustrating the importance of this by examining the strong association between social background and educational performance. The class-related factors in maths education for adults will be discussed and some ways suggested of overcoming class differentiation. I hope that the group can spend some time discussing this subject which is now 'taboo' in our supposedly 'classless' society.

#17

The practice of Independent Learning in Adult Basic Education

Mieke de Laat, Simone van Duin, Frank Haacke, Riny Beckers, Nettie van Leek (Regional Center for Adult Education, Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

Demands from society and government make it necessary to have a continuously changing proces in our adult education system. Students demand an individual approach. In a flexible  society it is a need for them to reach their goals quickly, without education that offers them superfluous knowledge.

The answer from us is independent learning. Teacher and student cooperate to achieve the planned goals. Students follow their own individual route and work together in groups.

The change of  our education stands for a new learning environment, new instruction means,  a different way of teaching and specific appliances to enable the student to learn more and more independently. These means are a plan board, tutorials and a special diary.

Individual routes are necessary in combination with learning in a group. The role of the teacher has changed from teaching into asking and explaining questions. The teacher keeps in mind the Plan-Do-Review principle all the time.

In this workshop we will present our experiences with independent learning and the specific appliances we developed for that. 

#18

Whose Numeracy?

Dhamma Colwell (King’s College, University of London, UK), Janet Duffin (University of Hull, UK), Sue Elliott (Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK)

The three presenters experience of teaching numeracy varies. Janet and Sue both work with undergraduates. Janet also works with university employees. Dhamma's experience is of teaching adults in Adult and Further Education provision (i.e. not university provision), mainly at the basic level, where many students also have low levels of written or spoken English. However, although our students are different our approaches to teaching are not. Our common approach is to discover and validate students' existing  knowledge, skills, attitudes to maths and current goals, which are very diverse.

By considering the attitudes and needs of students at different stages of life might we not further our work amongst adults learning mathematics by gaining greater insights into their different needs and attitudes? We invite colleagues who would like to discuss this issue to join us in a session at ALM 5

#19

A numeracy curriculum

Dave Tout,  Beth Marr  (Victoria, Australia)

This new innovative numeracy and mathematics curriculum framework has been developed for adults and has been widely used across Australia since 1997.The framework offers a style of competency or outcome statement which is holistic rather than fragmented, in that it is based upon realistic purposes and uses of mathematics, and which encompasses a particular perspective on numeracy and its relationship to mathematics. The paper outlines the rationale and development of the curriculum, explains how it is constructed, and gives some examples of the detailed learning outcomes and assessment criteria.

#20

Foundation maths and portfolio assessment: an Irish experience

John O’Donoghue  (University of Limerick, Ireland), Noel Conneran (City of Limerick Vocational Education Committee, Ireland)

The National council for Vocational Awards (NCVA) was established in 1991 to set, monitor and certify stadards for vocation, education and training programmes provided within the further education sector.

NCVA awards are intended to provide access to employment, further education and further training. The Council through its awards and activities serves as an important facilitating agency in life long learning for Irish citizens. Its awards are adult‑ focused and programmes leading to NCVA certification are conducted in a variety of settings including schools, workshops, community and adult education centres.

The NCVA has been innovative in its approach to assessment and certification. It has pioneered the  use of portfolios of evidence for assessment purposes in a wide range of subjects in Ireland. The authors have been providing support sevices for the Foundation Level Mathematics for a number of years including the training of tutors. This paper focuses on the use of portfolio assessment in foundation level mathematics:the stategy for implementation on a national scale; learners' portfolios; problems and opportunities; and future directions.

QUESTIONS

1. How important is assessment in adult mathematics learning?

2. Should mathematics assessment be tailored for adults? If so, how?

#21

Learning to learn other people’s knowledge - acquiring self-sufficiency in a math classroom

Brian G. Cann (University of Maryland, Heidelberg, Germany)

Mathematics is viewed by many adults as external to their lives and experience: it is seen as other people's knowledge. Without a sense of the personal relevance of the subject matter, mature study habits are frequently abandoned in favor of study strategies half remembered from school. The result is a feeling of not being in control that is expressed as math anxiety.

As more adults as required to take post school mathematics classes for skill acquisition or further qualification, the need to make learners aware of specific and successful study strategies for learning mathematics is also a way of opening access to the subject. This paper discusses the theoretical background and practical implementation of strategies that are currently being applied at the University of Maryland Mannheim Campus to raise students' awareness of how they can be active participants in their study of mathematics. The acquisition of appropriate study strategies is seen as a prior requisite for the willingness to embrace rather than avoid mathematics in the context of lifelong learning.

#22

Can skills acquired by learning mathematics be used in learning other topics?

Bert Imandt (Regional Center for Adult Education, Rotterdam, Netherlands)

The main question of this workshop will be: Can skills acquired by learning mathematics be used in learning other topics?

In lifelong learning the skill of learning is an essential skill. In societal and working situations people learn from activities, discussions, cooperation and success and failure. Most of the time this learning is not intended. It happens unconsciously: only when you are confronted with earlier experienced problems you can re-call what you have learned. The ways of learning in such cases are mostly totally unknown to the learner.

In learning mathematics one can learn a lot of learning skills as well. The learner has to explore and investigate problems. He has to try, test and reflect on solutions and ways of problem solving. He can learn to talk about problem solving.

Learning mathematics is a very good way of learning to learn. Teachers can use the teaching of mathematics to teach learning skills. By provoking discussion on problem solving he can force his students to think and compare several ways of problem solving. By stimulating reflection on problem solving he can force students to think about learning, etc.

In this workshop I want to discuss the skills used in problem solving and learning mathematics. I shall compare these skills with more general skills, used in learning. I want to explore ways of teaching these skills and teaching the use of these skills in other fields of education and societal activities.

#23

A democratic classroom

Alison Tomlin (London, UK)

I have been working on a research project which started out looking into using writing in adult basic maths classes, but has developed into looking into how to strengthen students’ voices in the classes. I will be sharing work including

-    using line graphs as a presentation of personal maths histories

-    a conference organised by and for students

-    arising from the conference, a magazine of students’ writing about maths, again produce by students

-    students writing their own maths questions

-    negotiating the curriculum and lesson plans

-    students observing and commenting on the discourse of their own classrooms.

I don’t want to take up all the time with me talking; some of this material will be in displays and handouts, and I hope participants will be able to share their own experiences.

This work has raised questions around what we mean by a democratic classroom or negotiating the curriculum, and it presents challenges to some traditional views of an appropriate curriculum. I hope the workshop will be of use to me in trying to develop a theoretical framework, and of practical use to people trying to work in similar directions.

The conference is about ‘What kind of maths should we teach?’ I would like to extend that question, so that we ask also ‘and who should decide?’  

#24

Application of Number in Vocational Training

David Kaye, City of Westminster College, London

During the last five years the GNVQ (General National Vocational Qualification) has been developed as the main qualification in England and Wales.

GNVQs are available for a wide range of vocational studies including Business Studies, Engineering, Health & Social Care, Information Technology, Leisure & Tourism and Science. All GNVQ courses include three compulsory ‘key skills’: Application of number, Communication and Information Technology. Each of these is available at three levels for Foundation, Intermediate and Advanced level students.

This presentation will look closely at the key skill of Application of Number which is intended to assess a basic competence in number skills with relevance to the chosen vocational area. This presentation will have three aims:

-    to give an introduction to the contents and assessment methods of Application of Number;

-    to raise issues and ask questions on the validity and reliability of Application of Number as a process for teaching and assessing students’ numeracy in a vocational context

-    to gather and collate the views of ALM5 attendees to these issues and questions with reference to the relevance of Application of Number in maintaining and improving lifelong learning

#25

The effect of gender and fluency in English on the mathematical confidence and achievement in a realistic mathematics course

Barbara Miller-Reilly (University of Auckland, New Zealand)

This research project aimed to explore the reactions of students to the style of teaching and assessment in a year-long mathematics course/paper at the University of Auckland, New Zealand. This paper was established to attract and help students returning to mathematics after a break, or to help students who have not succeeded in previous mathematics study. It aims to build the confidence of students by providing the opportunity for them to engage in mathematical modelling in a variety of contexts. A preliminary survey was undertaken in 1995 to explore students' reactions to the paper and the findings from this survey are presented.

A comparison was made of students' mathematical confidence, how relevant they found the approach, and their achievement in the paper. Results indicate that for students who are fluent in English, a higher proportion of females than males indicated a definite increase in mathematical confidence. In comparison, for students who are not fluent in English, a reasonably high proportion were negative about the approach in the paper, as well as the effect on their mathematical confidence, and this group did not achieve as well as those who were fluent in English.

These research results link to the 'Lifelong Learning' theme for this conference because many adults in this course have indicated in their evaluation and in personal discussions that they found the approach taken in this course to be relevant to them. They now have a better understanding of the usefulness of mathematics and more confidence to use mathematics themselves in their everyday lives. However other students are unable to gain this confidence and insight. Factors which seem to influence this outcome appear to be the students' fluency in English or their beliefs about the learning of mathematics.

#26        

On the Relationship between cognitive and affective components of learning mathematics

Prof. Wolfgang Schlöglmann (University of Linz, Austria)

If one considers the research on learning mathematics, one receives the impression that the learning of mathematics is primary a cognitive problem. However, in practice, the learning of mathematics is strongly influenced by affective components, especially in the case of adult education.

In the first part of my lecture I intend to discuss a general concept of L. Ciompi An Affect logic, which attempts to connect cognitive and affective aspects of learning.

In the second part, I will describe some consequences for the learning situation in courses of adult education in mathematics.

The relationship between cognitive and affective components are important for learning processes, especially in the case of ‘Lifelong Learning’.

#27

Common sense or good sense? Ethnomathematics and the Prospects for a Gramscian Politics of Adults' Mathematics Education.

Dr. Diana Coben (Goldsmiths College, University of London, UK)

#28

Teaching Mathematics across the undergradutate curriculu: an investigation into how specialist and non-specialist teachers of mathematics  explain successful teaching experiences, and how difficulties in teaching mathematics are perceived.

Pat Drake (University of Sussex Institute of Education, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RG, England)

Mathematics as a core subject is permeating the curriculum at undergraduate level, just as it did in schools and then in vocational further education and training. Thus there is, or shortly will be an even greater demand for teachers of mathematics to work with the students who need it to be taught. However, at advanced level in school, and at undergraduate level in university, fewer people are electing to study mathematics, despite an overall massification of higher education, suggesting a smaller pool of appropriately qualified people from which to draw teachers.

Experience from other sectors of education suggests that as the need arises, non‑specialist mathematicians are drawn into teaching mathematics, with varying degrees of enthusiasm. These teachers tend to take a pragmatic rather than an esoteric view of teaching mathematics, to start with at least being primarily concerned with their own mastery of the subject knowledge that was required of them. However I believe that non‑specialist mathematics teachers are characterised by range of approaches to and beliefs about successful mathematics teaching.  So far as I know, little attention has been paid to approaches taken by these teachers in the standard discourse of mathematics educators (through professional associations etc.).

It is the intention in this research project broadly to define circumstances associated with successful mathematics teaching and learning at university level, and to examine the issues from the perspective of those who are teaching mathematics, either as specialists or as non-specialists. Research questions are aimed at defining and exploring the relationships between specific cognitive, contextual and cultural dimensions that teachers of mathematics recognise in their teaching.

Lifelong learning question:

Non-specialist teachers of mathematics are drawn to working in mathematics in spite of as well as as a result of previous experience. What can be learned from these lifelong learners of mathematics?

#29        

Parents as Resources for Mathematical Instruction

Marta Civil and Rosi Andrade (University of Arizona, Tucson, USA)

This paper will address one component of a research project that aims at the development of mathematics instructional innovations in classrooms composed of predominantly minority working‑class students.  Our goal is to  develop teaching innovations in mathematics that capitalize on students' (and their families') knowledge and experiences from everyday life.  In the paper, we will focus on the work with parents in this project. 

This work takes three different avenues:

a)  teachers make ethnographic household visits of some of their students' parents.  Our premise is  that the students' households and community can provide strategic resources for classroom practice;

b)  regular mathematical workshops with a core group of working class, immigrant, Spanish speaking mothers. Through these workshops, we explore these women's ideas about and understanding of mathematics as well as their use of mathematics in their everyday life, while maintaining a two-way dialogue to better inform our work with their children;

c)  interviews to uncover the uses of mathematics in some typical occupations in this community (e.g., construction worker, carpenter, seamstress).  Analysis of these interviews should provide us with insight into curricular connections between in-school and out-of-school mathematics, as well as into our work with parents as adult learners of mathematics.

#30

Forum Discussion

Maths as part of lifelong learning

At the end of the conference the theme of the conference ‘Maths as part of lifelong Learning’ will be discussed during the forum discussion. Topics will be chosen from discussions coming from workshops, paper presentations, poster sessions and computer demos. Conference participants are asked to hand in these topics during the conference days in the conference secretary room.

ALM Archives Abstracts ALM5 in English  Abstracts ALM5 - Español Proceedings<